​"Ideally (since it is the foundation element upon which all else is built), when calcium is sufficiently present, the biological entity, whether it be a single cell, a plant, an animal or human, is able to discard toxins readily and does not have any magnetic attraction for environmental toxins such as pesticides, herbicides, or drugs." 


The Anatomy of Life & Energy in Agriculture was updated a few years ago and thankfully the above quoted phrase survived. I can't remember whether it was from one of his lectures I attended or from a book where he stressed that a high-Brix plant (i.e., high quality) grown in toxic soil will assay lower in toxic matter than a low-Brix plant (i.e., low quality) grown in organically "clean" soil. 

While we usually keep Reams-Ag and human RBTI separate, serious students can put 2 and 2 together. They should understand that the calcium-rich human subject with near perfect RBTI numbers can eat something with no distress that will just about do in their friend who ignores pH-established calcium needs to go through life with miserable RBTI numbers.

It is all about selective assimilation.

The dictionary describes "genome" as: the haploid set of chromosomes in a gamete or microorganism, or in each cell of a multicellular organism. The complete set of genes or genetic material present in a cell or organism.

That definition expands to cover the confusion offered to nature by scientists and their ever-pressing mission to somehow improve lifeforms via GMO (Genetically Modified Organism) processes. To listen to them, they will not be satisfied until they can modify life to the point it can be born, grow, and not age on a diet of nothing at all. Think "sunset technology" here and rest assured that nature will effortlessly continue to squash their lofty plans.

Most, if not all, authors quoted in the Reams Biological Theory of Ionization literature are uniformly unimpressed with GMO. They stand united in viewing lifeforms coming down the biological ages as fully perfect in every sense. They have unwavering trust that when those biologically perfect lifeforms are conceived and allowed to grow with the full spectrum of minerals needed for their respective kind, or order, they will progress through their lives unaffected by germ, parasite, or disease.

The RBTI community views all disease as a mineral deficiency. Their response when shown a gene sequence which claims to identify a "disease" is that if the appropriate minerals had been available at the time of the gene creation, a higher order of genetic expression would have developed.

Although there are several diseases, plant or animal, such as wheat rust or muscular dystrophy, that strongly resist mid-life reversal, almost all life forms will find health if their required building materials are present during seed, sperm, or egg development. Good parentage and good food (following a good birth) is to be devoutly desired and is absolutely our heritage. ​

​Rex Harrill

​I just went to Amazon and typed in "diet book." This is what I got...

220,370 results for "DIET BOOK"

Not individual books, TITLES OF DIFFERENT DIET BOOKS.

That is a LOT! Wouldn't you think that someone---anyone---should have hit on an answer by now?

I feel sure that if someone wanted to whittle that down by throwing out duplicates, similar books, or books with the same target (wheat allergy, weight reduction, or whatever), they maybe could get the total down to a hundred thousand or so.

Some of them really do sound scientific. A favorite is "Eat Right for Your Blood Type" or something like that. My personal favorite of long ago is "The Grapefruit Diet" That last is the one that teaches that the more grapefruit you consume, the more weight you lose and the healthier you get.

Reams felt they could all be lumped together under the title of "FADS." He taught that if anyone read enough health books they would probably come to the conclusion that there is nothing left to eat.

A common problem all those titles have is that they focus on either what you should consume or what you should not consume. None of them seem particularly interested in what YOUR body does with whatever any particular author is preaching.

RBTI truly is different. It measures what your body does with what you consume. Follow a fad diet if you wish. RBTI will soon enough help you figure if you helped or instead harmed yourself.

That grapefruit diet was a doozy. Thousands and thousands of people swore it helped them lose weight---the more they ate, they more they lost. Of course, their health steadily declined because they were eating sour, piss-poor quality grapefruit filled with acids, mal-formed proteins, potentially harmful aminos, and who knows what toxins. Their body was forced to expend huge amounts of precious energy disposing of bad stuff.

So the grapefruit diet died out pretty quickly. The author no doubt took the money and ran away to formulate yet another scam on the public. Neither he nor his sucker base ever learned that if you eat sweet, high Brix grapefruit as taught by Dr. Reams, in proper quantities, they would find weight stability. And this as their RBTI-measured health profile and energy would dramatically climb.

Who knew?

Someone wrote...
The oblongata still continues to furl my brow. 

​There are a lot of un-examined RBTI materials still out there.​ ​Reams' rather curious take on oblongata will clarify one day.​ Michael Olszta has wrestled with the problem and may some day have a better answer.

If today's student of the literature stands back and examines the long-ago student of Reams' classroom enough, they start realizing the class students are guilty of being awe-struck and failing in their duty to always understand Reams when he made mistakes, mis-speaks, or told jokes. How can we blame them? They were being inducted into a science beyond the ability of medical science to fathom, then or now. How can we blame Reams? He was surely bored with day after day introduction of real science into fad-heavy skulls.

Yes, there are numerous examples of Reams mis-speaking and some brave student pointing out a juxtaposition or boo-boo. Reams always sincerely thanked them. However, I contend there were many more cases where they did not do their duty and screw-ups passed into the transcriptionists' hands. We have to somehow discern these long ago aggravations and root them out.

​Perhaps my biggest complaint concerns cases where Reams told jokes or "let the devil get in me." For instance, he frequently chuckled when he told of the worm-eaten, almost-dead kitten that was saved with a K-Min salve he whipped up in the bathroom. The woman owner had insisted Reams "do something" at a very inconvenient time for him.​ Being a softie, he did provide the cure for the cat, but he told the woman that the salve had to be re-applied exactly on the hour, every hour---a huge inconvenience for the woman. He knew the salve would do the job if only applied a couple of times a day, but "the devil did get in him" and he freely confessed many times later to classes. It was all a joke and I, for one, appreciate a good joke.

A joke instance I picked up in the Ag classes concerns a student who evidently did not know that nematodes are microscopic worms that attack plant roots. Our student asked a dumb question about their nature and how big did they get. Reams, having fun, responded that they were reptile-like "snakes" and that they "get six feet long." No one in the class said, "Come on, Reams, you are having fun with us." The poor non-Ag transcriptionist later probably had no idea what was going on and failed to note the class chuckles. No doubt the ignorant student went home and swore to many that "this god-like man proved nematodes are real snakes and can grow up to six feet long." This could be how lots of urban legends get started.

Anyway, my point is that Reams said we should use common sense. That applies to our efforts to prepare lessons, literature, or explanations for modern RBTI students. When we see poor or out of date English in dusty transcriptions, we should improve things. We should not mindlessly parrot decades old confusions, even if they come from "holy writ" like the ARM or CLOD. We can do better and I expect he would be proud of us for doing so.

On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 6:44 PM, 
​an anonymous contact personally, but gently, chided me
:
you could be giving us something enlightening to read

​I hear what you are saying.

Have you reviewed the blog posts? It is difficult to find enough free time to contribute there, but I do try. I have also invited anyone with a burning desire to say something meaningful to submit entries on the RBTI topic as guest bloggers. So far I think Challen Waychoff is the only one to take up the offer.
http://www.brixman.com/blog-page/category/rbti%20trumps
 
A good bit of my time is spent working on publications.
​
 http://www.amazon.com/Rob-Owen-Class-RBTI-Transcript/dp/1514277913/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1460971339&sr=8-1&keywords=Rex+Harrill

http://www.amazon.com/March-April-1977-Biological-Ionization/dp/1523892781/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1460971346&sr=8-2&keywords=Rex+Harrill


http://www.thebookpatch.com/BookStoreResults?search=harrill&ddl=any

The intent is to keep meaningful literature available for those who wish to wade into deeper waters.

Rex Harrill

Someone said: I'm responding my intrigue in ag rule number 16., "see everything you look at."

Carey Reams adopted "see everything you look at" because so many of his agricultural clients were shortsighted. He wanted to bring them along on a long training process. It is very difficult to fully explain what he taught over the years, but a few examples may help. It also helps to think of him as a Sherlock Holmes type---seeing many clues that most overlook.

Here is an example: many people look at crops and don't notice that some plants are ignored by pests and others are greedily attacked. When you test the Brix and find that the pest-free crops are high Brix and the damaged crops are low Brix, you can't be so easily fooled the next time. You will "see" what you are looking at.

Here is another example: one field will dry out a day after a scanty rain and another field across the road will remain moist. Plants in the latter field will thrive even when the extension agent is claiming the county is in "a drought". That has to do with the carbon content (think organic matter) and you again have to "see" what you are looking at.

A third example has to do with people. Once you understand that the narrow pointy face of a kid who needs braces is due to a poorly-mineralized diet, you can never look at a kid's face again without "seeing what you are looking at." This one is not strictly Reams, as Weston A. Price, and William Albrecht also addressed the phenomenon.

As a person practices more "seeing," they start noticing things they never realized. Even medical doctors are trained to see conditions lying ahead that the layman will not observe. A case in point is how a good doctor (yes, there are many) can know years in advance that someone will one day suffer Huntington's chorea.

I guess I can close by saying "seeing" is an art as much as a science.

Rex

I am thinking this is a good time to share some basics about supplements. In Reams' day there were many hangers-on who visualized themselves getting rich selling supplements. He got rid of them. My reading of the old documents is that Reams felt focusing on selling instead of simply running tests was not such a good idea. I think he suggested that many testers would be better off to form an alliance with a health food store and let them stock basic supplements. In return, the store would send sick folks to the tester. One of the more senior consultants has told me of a mid-west operation that is working very well that way.

The Yahoo RBTI group is a study forum, not a RBTI classroom. However, people there are always looking for ways to make RBTI easier and more efficient. There are some people there who are interested in making their own supplements. Clarence Johnson gave a lecture back in 1977 that included some great ideas for "roll your own" and I am attaching the pages from the transcript. I am also going to copy over the notes I have collected about Algavim-whatever. BTW, I do believe one of the members once pointed out that anyone can purchase the product in bulk at Amazon and put up their own capsules cheaply.

RBTI is not as hard as some try to make it. Skimpy finances should not be an excuse to keep you and your loved ones sick.

Rex Harrill

ALGAVIM
NOTE: Algavim, Algazim, Alganim, and AlgaLife (or others) are similar formulations of a low-sodium Norwegian sea plant harvested from fjords. Your personal consultant may have a preference. All instances in this document have been changed to read "Algavim" as that is the name Reams used 100 times in the ARM..
ARM: The older and weaker or the lower the reserve energy, the more they need Algavim and Min-Col. These are good to give pregnant women to help restore the body of mother and baby.
ARM: Algavim is excellent for cataracts.  The cataracts go away without any operation.  Also good for glaucoma.  Use Algavim 2, 3, or 4 times a day with meals.  Algavim makes vitamin A available to your system.
BEDDOE: [Algavim] is a source of an enzyme that is a catalyst to the uptake and availability of vitamin A.
BEDDOE: Algavim is used for four primary reasons. One, it has a low salt with proper oil content, while still having good levels of available iodine for feeding thyroid needs. Each capsule has .225mg of iodine naturally available. Two, it is a general vitamin and trace mineral supplement. Three, it is a source of a type of potassium that is easily used by the body. Four, it is a source of an enzyme that is a catalyst to the uptake and availability of vitamin A. The organs that especially benefit from its use are the eyes, skin, lungs, blood, pancreas, liver and brain. 
CHALLEN: Bone cancer - Heavy amounts of Min-Col and Algavim. 
CHALLEN: If, on the initial test, the client has a total of the ureas of 11 or less, then they probably have a 220 or brain tumor. The messages are not getting through to the rest of the body. Never tell the client, because they are already too nervous. Never put this client on a fast because they cannot afford to lose any energy. Just put them on a good diet and lemonade and retest and if urea total is greater than 12, then they are gaining on tumor, if less than 12 the 220 is the same. These clients cause the most trouble and are not responsible for what they say. Should eat lots of potassium foods i.e. hominy, salmon, sardines, Algavim, bananas, etc.
CHALLEN: If no inflammation or pus on cataract, then use Algavim and a good diet.
C.H.E.M: Algavim is a bromeliad, which means that it does not have any roots, but it has bromelain similar to pineapple. It is not a kelp, it is a bromeliad. It is harvested once every seven years in the coldest month of winter. When it is taken out of the sea and put up on the deck of the ship, it freezes instantly, and the salt is crystallized out of it; it turns almost pure white. When the ship is brought into port, fresh water is used to wash the salt off and then it is processed to remove the oil. That which is left over is the supplement Algavim. It has no salt or oil.
C.H.E.M: Whenever the pancreas is manufacturing too much or not enough insulin, Algavim is needed.
CLASS 1-5: Algavim is a powder and it does a marvelous thing for people who have cataracts and eye trouble.  It's a rich source of mineral, free of salt and sodium. 
CLASS 1-5: Also one of the processes of aging is a lack of vitamin A, and practically all senior citizens over 60 need some Algavim to help make vitamin A available, and it does a fabulous job.  Carrot juice is rich in vitamin A but you don't give carrot juice to anyone that is on insulin, diabinese, orinate or diabinate because it is high in sugars.
CLASS 1-5: When people take Algavim, plus getting their body chemistry in top shape, in about 5 to 6 months of taking it regularly the cataract disappears. Doc saw people that were totally blinded by it, that had to be led everywhere, and their problem disappeared completely in one year.
DAILY: Min-Col and Algavim are long-term minerals. They are used initially in assisting to restructure the body chemistry and are continued to help maintain this balance and keep the body from slipping back into its old patterns. Do not be surprised if you're told to take Algavim for at least a year or to take Min-Col for the next 43 years, etc. It's his way of telling you that you are always going to need mineralization. The vast majority of these should come from your diet. Each year however, tests show foods slipping in nutritional value. A study in Iowa showed corn protein down 15% in ten years. To hedge against this food value loss, Reams will have you continue some minerals indefinitely. Health is a worthwhile investment. 
DUNLAP: Algavim is green and is helpful when sugars are in high ranges. Algavim assists vitamin A to assimilate more easily. Reams would have said that Algavim makes Vitamin A more available to the body. 
ION INSTITUTE: Individuals with an extreme potassium deficiency or who sweat profusely should use 3 [Algavim] capsules 3 times a day.
ION INSTITUTE: Algavim has little to no effect on the pH. The vitamin and mineral materials are used to rebuild the liver. This will be reflected in improved saliva pH readings over an extended period of time. 
ION INSTITUTE: The brain's need for potassium and hence Algavim increases when the ureas are low and/or any type of heavy metal poisoning occurs. Algavim is the brain's most nourishing overall food.
JOHNSON: Algavim is used for both high and low sugars, as is distilled water.
MANTHEI: Question: What kind of potassium are you using? Manthei: I use Min-Col and Algavim first and foremost, hominy every day, and celery juice and food sources.
MANTHEId: What are the two food supplements that are the richest source of minerals for the body? The answer is Algavim Min-Col.

Someone asked...
What about this other list we find in the internet - free for all - alkaline/acid food - is this the same ?

​I am surprised that several people did not jump to help you.

Whatever...check the ARM and you will see where Reams said, "​Combinations of foods, there’s a little bit of truth in it.  Only a little bit.  Fads.  I have not been able to bear out any of those things in laboratory work testing people.​"​
​ 
"Food combining" has to do with the widely touted "acid/alkaline"​ concept popularized by Dr. John Tilden, one of my heroes. There are all sorts of charts out there to help people and Tilden had decades of success with the method. My research makes me think that Tilden probably helped a dozen people get well for every one that Reams helped.

The paradox of Tilden pushing one thing and Reams another probably can be resolved by realizing that Tilden had no test equipment when working with severely digestive-impaired clients. He taught that they should eat far less food and to be picky about it. OTOH, Reams' research showed him that the digestive power was greatest when the saliva pH was 6.4 (saliva and liver digestive juices are like mirrors).

You don't affect the liver digestive juices by paying attention to "acid/alkaline" charts. You affect them by paying attention to the predominant calcium types in the foods you eat. Some of those types help move the saliva in a cationic direction, some are neutral, and some provide the calcium type that moves things toward the anionic side.

I don't know if Beddoe teaches this. I know that Manthei was given the information by Reams, but I'm not sure he ever paid close attention. I do know that Michael Olszta took the information and ran with it. He and his students have developed some handy charts and I personally think all RBTIers should have one to help them work on their diet so that they are not constantly having to take so darn many supplements just to offset poor food choices. 

The above is one of the more important reasons I always advise people to get a competent teacher and learn the basics. This is not a teaching forum, but all of us here have a responsibility to explain things in great detail when a question indicates the person asking is going in a very wrong direction.

The long and short of it is this: dump the acid/alkaline charts and learn RBTI or forget RBTI and spend years playing with something that will only frustrate you. "Go by the numbers" is as real as it gets.