This calculation of energy is very difficult, and only those who master the subject through the ninth seminar will be able to calculate the energy level. There are people now that say they have cracked the code and that they can calculate the energy level. Believe them not. There is no way to crack a code because there is no code. It's simply mathematics used according to the age, height, weight, sex, race, as well as the specimen readings. ...Carey Reams: CHOOSE LIFE OR DEATH |
CRACKING THE RESERVE ENERGY CODE
THIS CHART IS COMPOSED OF SPECIFIC CASES WHERE CAREY REAMS CALCULATED THE RESERVE ENERGY FOR KNOWN URINE/SALIVA VALUES |
|||||||||||||
RE | SOURCE | BRIX | UpH | SpH | SALTS | ALB | NN | AN | AGE | HEIGHT | WEIGHT | SEX | RACE |
8% | CLOD | 1.5 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 6.5 | .04M | 3 | 3 | 0 | 24" | 7 | F | - |
10% | CLOD | 1.5 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 6.5 | .04M | 3 | 3 | 0 | 24" | 7 | M | - |
30% | CLOD | .08* | 5.2 | 5.4 | 18 | 4M | 4 | 6 | 50 | 65" | 130 | F | - |
34% | Nord Davis | 7.0 | 5.8 | 8.0 | 27 | 4M | 10 | 10 | 45 | - | - | M | W |
38% | Reams tape | 9.6 | 5.3 | 7.0 | 10 | 4M | 9 | 8 | 46 | 64" | 190 | F | W |
47% | Reams tape | 1.8 | 6.6 | 5.6 | 6 | 4M | 1 | 16 | 34 | 66" | 160 | M | W? |
48% | HGFS | 6.4 | 6.2 | 6.8 | 18 | 4M | 10 | 11 | 51 | 70" | 145 | M | W |
51% | HGFS | 5.4 | 7.2 | 7.6 | 28 | 4M | 10 | 12 | 55 | 69" | 160 | M | W |
53% | HGFS | 2.2 | 6.6 | X | 12 | 4M | 11 | 9 | 55 | 69" | 160 | M | W |
54% | HGFS | 1.0 | 7.0 | X | 7 | 4M | 10 | 9 | 51 | 70" | 145 | M | W |
78% | Manthei class | ||||||||||||
83% | Manthei class | 1.6 | 5.8 | 6.9 | 12 | 4M | 8 | 7 | 28 | 63" | 140 | F | - |
90% | Manthei class | ||||||||||||
92% | Manthei class | 1.6 | 5.9 | 6.9 | 12 | 4M | 8 | 7 | 28 | 63" | 140 | F | - |
100% | CLOD | 1.5 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 6.5 | .04M | 3 | 3 | 20 | - | - | - | - |
100% | CLOD | 1.5 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 6.5 | .04M | 3 | 3 | 40 | - | - | - | - |
100% | CLOD | 1.5 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 6.5 | .04M | 3 | 3 | 60 | - | - | - | - |
HGFS: Health Guide for Survival; CLOD: Choose Life or Death: (*) could this be a typo for .8?
This link goes to a short audio clip "Nuances" where Reams said that he needed to know the duration of time between the analysis readings of the same young woman shown as 92% and 83%. Note the major change in reserve energy that occurred when the urine pH moved just 1/10th of a pH point. Such readings illustrate that RE calculation could be quite difficult for those using pH paper or the original reagents. On the other hand, you can hear Reams clearly saying that "you are gaining energy when your numbers are moving closer to the perfect equation." Perhaps that is all we really need to know.
An interesting observation is that for mature people a stable brix reading near the perfect 1.5 tends to indicate a higher reserve energy. Further study may indicate to some that brix below 1.0 or above about 5 speaks to a RE rating of less than 50. This could be a compelling reason to never miss the 1, 2, or 3 daily pancreas-healing green drinks so often mentioned in RBTI.
Note: Please share any reserve energy values you may have that Reams calculated. While several people have volunteered to search through their old files for usable calculations, more data is desperately needed. Anything you send in that checks out will be included in the chart. It should be noted that even though there are claims by people that they can calculate reserve energy, there are many 1st generation Reams students who publicly deny the process was ever taught. They felt that Reams "kept an ace in the hole" so that he would not become dispensable---an ace that he took to the grave.
As of today only Michael Olszta has bothered to provide any additional data. Various people have commented privately with grim irony that this entire website seems to be visited by "takers" only. I only hope that they are one day proved wrong. The Reams tradition is to give, but the light often glows dim. There are stacks of energy calculation cards in dusty files and it is time for them to be sent in.