What is the RBTI Desk Reference & Critique?
Carey Reams died in 1985. Although he had taught the Reams Biological Theory of Ionization in hundreds of seminars to thousands of students, he actually published little beyond Choose Life Or Death.
However, his top students who undertook teaching have written much in the three decades since his passing. In addition, many of his seminar tapes have been transcribed, some literal and some polished. All the published materials have something to offer. Interestingly, serious RBTI study of those materials often reveals that while one student may have focused on one aspect of RBTI, other students found other aspects more important. While implying open conflict is perhaps unfair, it is plain that teachers do not always see things in the same way all the time.
Several years ago I started compiling notes of those differences into tables so they could be compared and critiqued Happily, many of those notes show a degree of support, one for the other. However, sadly, the arranged critique sometimes indicates that one source or the other "got it wrong." The question is not so much who is right and who is wrong, but which view best illustrates what Reams wanted us to learn. This book can help you get where you want to go.
It is sold through the printer/publisher. You can read an extensive preview on this page.
However, his top students who undertook teaching have written much in the three decades since his passing. In addition, many of his seminar tapes have been transcribed, some literal and some polished. All the published materials have something to offer. Interestingly, serious RBTI study of those materials often reveals that while one student may have focused on one aspect of RBTI, other students found other aspects more important. While implying open conflict is perhaps unfair, it is plain that teachers do not always see things in the same way all the time.
Several years ago I started compiling notes of those differences into tables so they could be compared and critiqued Happily, many of those notes show a degree of support, one for the other. However, sadly, the arranged critique sometimes indicates that one source or the other "got it wrong." The question is not so much who is right and who is wrong, but which view best illustrates what Reams wanted us to learn. This book can help you get where you want to go.
It is sold through the printer/publisher. You can read an extensive preview on this page.
| publicpages.pdf |