If you are into RBTI, you probably are aware that the basic (or grunt) work calls for proper water drinking to wash out the constantly collecting nasties as a major step. 

The next step is to seek out and consume the substances that are used to build new cells to replace the worn-out. 

A key part of that process is to eat a significantly varied diet so that the body has a chance to absorb all the minerals needed. If you understand plants, you can appreciate that plant A is richer in substance P {or L or G or whatever) than another plant type. 

A classic example is that asparagus, turnips, parsnips, celery, and Min-Col are rich in the much-needed arsenic for the heart. Other plants are richer in different minerals and the varied diet helps us mine them out if our digestive juices are strong (proper pH).

But what do you do when the plants are so devoid of minerals that you can't get what is needed from your diet?

Supplement, of course. RBTI has a focus on Min-Col plus Algavim for average cases with special supplements in some cases, mainly to get the calciums high enough.

If you understand all that, you may love this video that shows elephants mining underground for minerals because the vegetation they get is from leached out soil.

https://youtu.be/7OcZmSJ6Ajk
​

​"Ideally (since it is the foundation element upon which all else is built), when calcium is sufficiently present, the biological entity, whether it be a single cell, a plant, an animal or human, is able to discard toxins readily and does not have any magnetic attraction for environmental toxins such as pesticides, herbicides, or drugs." 


The Anatomy of Life & Energy in Agriculture was updated a few years ago and thankfully the above quoted phrase survived. I can't remember whether it was from one of his lectures I attended or from a book where he stressed that a high-Brix plant (i.e., high quality) grown in toxic soil will assay lower in toxic matter than a low-Brix plant (i.e., low quality) grown in organically "clean" soil. 

While we usually keep Reams-Ag and human RBTI separate, serious students can put 2 and 2 together. They should understand that the calcium-rich human subject with near perfect RBTI numbers can eat something with no distress that will just about do in their friend who ignores pH-established calcium needs to go through life with miserable RBTI numbers.

It is all about selective assimilation.

The dictionary describes "genome" as: the haploid set of chromosomes in a gamete or microorganism, or in each cell of a multicellular organism. The complete set of genes or genetic material present in a cell or organism.

That definition expands to cover the confusion offered to nature by scientists and their ever-pressing mission to somehow improve lifeforms via GMO (Genetically Modified Organism) processes. To listen to them, they will not be satisfied until they can modify life to the point it can be born, grow, and not age on a diet of nothing at all. Think "sunset technology" here and rest assured that nature will effortlessly continue to squash their lofty plans.

Most, if not all, authors quoted in the Reams Biological Theory of Ionization literature are uniformly unimpressed with GMO. They stand united in viewing lifeforms coming down the biological ages as fully perfect in every sense. They have unwavering trust that when those biologically perfect lifeforms are conceived and allowed to grow with the full spectrum of minerals needed for their respective kind, or order, they will progress through their lives unaffected by germ, parasite, or disease.

The RBTI community views all disease as a mineral deficiency. Their response when shown a gene sequence which claims to identify a "disease" is that if the appropriate minerals had been available at the time of the gene creation, a higher order of genetic expression would have developed.

Although there are several diseases, plant or animal, such as wheat rust or muscular dystrophy, that strongly resist mid-life reversal, almost all life forms will find health if their required building materials are present during seed, sperm, or egg development. Good parentage and good food (following a good birth) is to be devoutly desired and is absolutely our heritage. ​

​Rex Harrill

​I just went to Amazon and typed in "diet book." This is what I got...

220,370 results for "DIET BOOK"

Not individual books, TITLES OF DIFFERENT DIET BOOKS.

That is a LOT! Wouldn't you think that someone---anyone---should have hit on an answer by now?

I feel sure that if someone wanted to whittle that down by throwing out duplicates, similar books, or books with the same target (wheat allergy, weight reduction, or whatever), they maybe could get the total down to a hundred thousand or so.

Some of them really do sound scientific. A favorite is "Eat Right for Your Blood Type" or something like that. My personal favorite of long ago is "The Grapefruit Diet" That last is the one that teaches that the more grapefruit you consume, the more weight you lose and the healthier you get.

Reams felt they could all be lumped together under the title of "FADS." He taught that if anyone read enough health books they would probably come to the conclusion that there is nothing left to eat.

A common problem all those titles have is that they focus on either what you should consume or what you should not consume. None of them seem particularly interested in what YOUR body does with whatever any particular author is preaching.

RBTI truly is different. It measures what your body does with what you consume. Follow a fad diet if you wish. RBTI will soon enough help you figure if you helped or instead harmed yourself.

That grapefruit diet was a doozy. Thousands and thousands of people swore it helped them lose weight---the more they ate, they more they lost. Of course, their health steadily declined because they were eating sour, piss-poor quality grapefruit filled with acids, mal-formed proteins, potentially harmful aminos, and who knows what toxins. Their body was forced to expend huge amounts of precious energy disposing of bad stuff.

So the grapefruit diet died out pretty quickly. The author no doubt took the money and ran away to formulate yet another scam on the public. Neither he nor his sucker base ever learned that if you eat sweet, high Brix grapefruit as taught by Dr. Reams, in proper quantities, they would find weight stability. And this as their RBTI-measured health profile and energy would dramatically climb.

Who knew?

Someone wrote...
The oblongata still continues to furl my brow. 

​There are a lot of un-examined RBTI materials still out there.​ ​Reams' rather curious take on oblongata will clarify one day.​ Michael Olszta has wrestled with the problem and may some day have a better answer.

If today's student of the literature stands back and examines the long-ago student of Reams' classroom enough, they start realizing the class students are guilty of being awe-struck and failing in their duty to always understand Reams when he made mistakes, mis-speaks, or told jokes. How can we blame them? They were being inducted into a science beyond the ability of medical science to fathom, then or now. How can we blame Reams? He was surely bored with day after day introduction of real science into fad-heavy skulls.

Yes, there are numerous examples of Reams mis-speaking and some brave student pointing out a juxtaposition or boo-boo. Reams always sincerely thanked them. However, I contend there were many more cases where they did not do their duty and screw-ups passed into the transcriptionists' hands. We have to somehow discern these long ago aggravations and root them out.

​Perhaps my biggest complaint concerns cases where Reams told jokes or "let the devil get in me." For instance, he frequently chuckled when he told of the worm-eaten, almost-dead kitten that was saved with a K-Min salve he whipped up in the bathroom. The woman owner had insisted Reams "do something" at a very inconvenient time for him.​ Being a softie, he did provide the cure for the cat, but he told the woman that the salve had to be re-applied exactly on the hour, every hour---a huge inconvenience for the woman. He knew the salve would do the job if only applied a couple of times a day, but "the devil did get in him" and he freely confessed many times later to classes. It was all a joke and I, for one, appreciate a good joke.

A joke instance I picked up in the Ag classes concerns a student who evidently did not know that nematodes are microscopic worms that attack plant roots. Our student asked a dumb question about their nature and how big did they get. Reams, having fun, responded that they were reptile-like "snakes" and that they "get six feet long." No one in the class said, "Come on, Reams, you are having fun with us." The poor non-Ag transcriptionist later probably had no idea what was going on and failed to note the class chuckles. No doubt the ignorant student went home and swore to many that "this god-like man proved nematodes are real snakes and can grow up to six feet long." This could be how lots of urban legends get started.

Anyway, my point is that Reams said we should use common sense. That applies to our efforts to prepare lessons, literature, or explanations for modern RBTI students. When we see poor or out of date English in dusty transcriptions, we should improve things. We should not mindlessly parrot decades old confusions, even if they come from "holy writ" like the ARM or CLOD. We can do better and I expect he would be proud of us for doing so.

On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 6:44 PM, 
​an anonymous contact personally, but gently, chided me
:
you could be giving us something enlightening to read

​I hear what you are saying.

Have you reviewed the blog posts? It is difficult to find enough free time to contribute there, but I do try. I have also invited anyone with a burning desire to say something meaningful to submit entries on the RBTI topic as guest bloggers. So far I think Challen Waychoff is the only one to take up the offer.
http://www.brixman.com/blog-page/category/rbti%20trumps
 
A good bit of my time is spent working on publications.
​
 http://www.amazon.com/Rob-Owen-Class-RBTI-Transcript/dp/1514277913/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1460971339&sr=8-1&keywords=Rex+Harrill

http://www.amazon.com/March-April-1977-Biological-Ionization/dp/1523892781/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1460971346&sr=8-2&keywords=Rex+Harrill


http://www.thebookpatch.com/BookStoreResults?search=harrill&ddl=any

The intent is to keep meaningful literature available for those who wish to wade into deeper waters.

Rex Harrill

Someone said: I'm responding my intrigue in ag rule number 16., "see everything you look at."

Carey Reams adopted "see everything you look at" because so many of his agricultural clients were shortsighted. He wanted to bring them along on a long training process. It is very difficult to fully explain what he taught over the years, but a few examples may help. It also helps to think of him as a Sherlock Holmes type---seeing many clues that most overlook.

Here is an example: many people look at crops and don't notice that some plants are ignored by pests and others are greedily attacked. When you test the Brix and find that the pest-free crops are high Brix and the damaged crops are low Brix, you can't be so easily fooled the next time. You will "see" what you are looking at.

Here is another example: one field will dry out a day after a scanty rain and another field across the road will remain moist. Plants in the latter field will thrive even when the extension agent is claiming the county is in "a drought". That has to do with the carbon content (think organic matter) and you again have to "see" what you are looking at.

A third example has to do with people. Once you understand that the narrow pointy face of a kid who needs braces is due to a poorly-mineralized diet, you can never look at a kid's face again without "seeing what you are looking at." This one is not strictly Reams, as Weston A. Price, and William Albrecht also addressed the phenomenon.

As a person practices more "seeing," they start noticing things they never realized. Even medical doctors are trained to see conditions lying ahead that the layman will not observe. A case in point is how a good doctor (yes, there are many) can know years in advance that someone will one day suffer Huntington's chorea.

I guess I can close by saying "seeing" is an art as much as a science.

Rex